Should one choose a (ultra wide) lens with the lowest possible distortion even though its resolution is not very good, over a lens that is very sharp, but has noticeable (barrel/mustache) distortion?
Example is the Sigma 12-24mm Mark I (low distortion, so-so resolution) VS Sigma 12-24 Mark II (pronounced distortion, far better resolution than Mk. I).
Will the lower distortion lens save a lot more time for the real estate photographer's workflow? Or is better resolution worth the added post-processing time?
No comments:
Post a Comment