I was shooting today using two off-camera speedlites fired using radio-triggers. Images were captured in RAW. Mode was AV. I have the camera set to display the captured image for a few seconds immediately after it's taken. Weirdly this image would always appear severely under-exposed. However, if I then displayed the image again it would appear correctly exposed. I've now download all the images to the computer and all are correctly exposed. It's as if the camera is initially showing a partially processed image from the RAW capture. Has anyone else experienced this? Is it "normal"? Whatever the case, it's unnerving as I kept thinking the speedlites must not have fired. I don't use flash very often so need a bit of reassurance that something odd isn't occurring.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Why is the front element of a telephoto lens larger than a wide angle lens?
A wide angle lens has a wide angle of view, therefore it would make sense that the front of the lens would also be wide. A telephoto lens ha...
-
I have the Canon 600D and the "nifty fifty" 50mm f/1.8 that cost around 100$. One day when I was trying to switch lenses, I presse...
-
I found this scene to be quite beautiful for sure, but when I look at it from the photographer's view point, I find that that person ju...
-
How does Picasa decide how to process RAW photos? When I shoot in RAW+JPEG the two pictures can look dramatically different. Is it just conv...
-
If you look at a source like Library of Congress royalty free gallery, they go an extra step beyond just dumping a bunch of images, but pro...
No comments:
Post a Comment