I was shooting today using two off-camera speedlites fired using radio-triggers. Images were captured in RAW. Mode was AV. I have the camera set to display the captured image for a few seconds immediately after it's taken. Weirdly this image would always appear severely under-exposed. However, if I then displayed the image again it would appear correctly exposed. I've now download all the images to the computer and all are correctly exposed. It's as if the camera is initially showing a partially processed image from the RAW capture. Has anyone else experienced this? Is it "normal"? Whatever the case, it's unnerving as I kept thinking the speedlites must not have fired. I don't use flash very often so need a bit of reassurance that something odd isn't occurring.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Why is the front element of a telephoto lens larger than a wide angle lens?
A wide angle lens has a wide angle of view, therefore it would make sense that the front of the lens would also be wide. A telephoto lens ha...
-
Normally I use lens-hoods on every of my glasses (flairlight blocker, lens protection). Some days ago a bought the Canon EF 40mm STM (Panca...
-
I know that a real gray card is the best thing to use to determine exposure. But I'd like to know if there are other naturally available...
-
I encounter a contradiction. Many resources state that a digital sensor are unsensitive to UV light. Even wikipedia, "However, newer ph...
-
I've read a lot around this site that an ideal quality of the lens is achieved when using f-stop roughly 2 stops slower than the fastest...
No comments:
Post a Comment