Nikon has a single Nano Crystal Coating, while Canon has not only an equivalent coating (Sub Wavelength Coating), but they also have an Air Sphere coating which seems to do much the same thing. Why does Canon have two kinds of similar coatings? Is one cheaper but not as good? Do they do significantly different things? Is one of them weaker to such an extent that it needs to be combined with traditional lens coatings on the same surface to get best results?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
Normally I use lens-hoods on every of my glasses (flairlight blocker, lens protection). Some days ago a bought the Canon EF 40mm STM (Panca...
-
I got lost finding the right remote shutter release for my Canon 5D Mark iii. I have the Hänhel Combi for Canon, which I use to use with Ca...
-
Whenever I compare the exif data displayed by Flickr or the data on Lightroom (3.4), I can't avoid getting my mind blown for the simple ...
-
I want to enlarge an image to a bigger size. This will cause pixelation. So I want to apply some treatment to it in Photoshop that will supp...
No comments:
Post a Comment