In my opinion an articulated display (one that rotates to allow viewing at different angles) is a big advantage for a modern camera. But I see that most professional and/or more expensive cameras do not offer it.
An articulated display is a long-time standard feature for all video camcorders, yet most modern DSLRs with video capabilities offer no such feature.
What is the reason for not making the articulated display a 'standard" feature on any high-end camera?
Answer
Articulated displays are just another moving part that is not typically necessary on pro grade equipment. Adding a screen like that will likely increase the size of the camera, and also make the screen more vulnerable to damage and wear.
Some pro series cameras also now have options for external LCD screens that can be attached to the body. Many videographers use these.
The main advantage to me, is to use the camera from odd angles. If for example you were at a concert and wanted to capture an image of the band, but you were short - you can use the articulating screen to still see what you are capturing. The same goes for objects down low.
Finally, I personally rarely use my LCD screen for image capture, I am much more inclined to use the viewfinder if the camera has one.
No comments:
Post a Comment