I would like to take better photos of the stars, especially the milky way, but my highest ISO setting is 1600. I have now learnt that image stacking can help reduce noise when taken with the same parameters but will it also provide more detail to the final merged image for editing? Ideally I would like to try it out, but we have had weeks of rain and no clear skies, so, hence me asking here first. Also, normally, I would take a 20 to 25 second exposure without stacking, what shorter exposure time would you recommend and also what number of images would be needed to get the best results when using stacking for this purpose?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Why is the front element of a telephoto lens larger than a wide angle lens?
A wide angle lens has a wide angle of view, therefore it would make sense that the front of the lens would also be wide. A telephoto lens ha...
-
I have the Canon 600D and the "nifty fifty" 50mm f/1.8 that cost around 100$. One day when I was trying to switch lenses, I presse...
-
I found this scene to be quite beautiful for sure, but when I look at it from the photographer's view point, I find that that person ju...
-
How does Picasa decide how to process RAW photos? When I shoot in RAW+JPEG the two pictures can look dramatically different. Is it just conv...
-
If you look at a source like Library of Congress royalty free gallery, they go an extra step beyond just dumping a bunch of images, but pro...
No comments:
Post a Comment