I know that there are a few questions here already about low light photography and image noise. I want to know why Ridley Scott can shoot very low light scenes (including publicity stills), yet I can't. 1/24 sec exposures are comparatively huge for motion photography, yet his film looks amazing and my cave photos are naff (I'm a caver, sorry.) Similarly my mobile phone creations are full of noise, but his (film) images aren't. Am I missing something fundamental between the two arts?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
If you look at a source like Library of Congress royalty free gallery, they go an extra step beyond just dumping a bunch of images, but pro...
-
I have the Canon 600D and the "nifty fifty" 50mm f/1.8 that cost around 100$. One day when I was trying to switch lenses, I presse...
-
I have a Fuji X-T10 and an XC 50-230 4.5-6.7 OIS II lens. Normally its OIS is incredible. But there is a particular combination of settings ...
-
I found this scene to be quite beautiful for sure, but when I look at it from the photographer's view point, I find that that person ju...
No comments:
Post a Comment