ISO is been around since analogue photo times. Any, it should have been uniform for obvious reasons - you could never know what will be captured in each part of the film. So, you go uniform (ISO 100, ISO 200), select appropriate one for given conditions and do your best. Fast forward to today and we have same approach. Despite the fact that in digital photography "you know" or, rather, image sensor knows what will be captured by each pixel or group of pixels. Here's the question, why it couldn't measure sensitivity per area or, even, per pixel and have nonuniform ISO settings across the sensor? What prohibits having ISO level automatically set per pixel?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Why is the front element of a telephoto lens larger than a wide angle lens?
A wide angle lens has a wide angle of view, therefore it would make sense that the front of the lens would also be wide. A telephoto lens ha...
-
I want to enlarge an image to a bigger size. This will cause pixelation. So I want to apply some treatment to it in Photoshop that will supp...
-
Canon 80 D with DIGIC 6 was released in Feb 2016. Canon 77D with DIGIC 7 was released in Feb 2017.Does that make the canon 77D better than c...
-
I got lost finding the right remote shutter release for my Canon 5D Mark iii. I have the Hänhel Combi for Canon, which I use to use with Ca...
-
I have a Fuji X-T10 and an XC 50-230 4.5-6.7 OIS II lens. Normally its OIS is incredible. But there is a particular combination of settings ...
No comments:
Post a Comment