ISO is been around since analogue photo times. Any, it should have been uniform for obvious reasons - you could never know what will be captured in each part of the film. So, you go uniform (ISO 100, ISO 200), select appropriate one for given conditions and do your best. Fast forward to today and we have same approach. Despite the fact that in digital photography "you know" or, rather, image sensor knows what will be captured by each pixel or group of pixels. Here's the question, why it couldn't measure sensitivity per area or, even, per pixel and have nonuniform ISO settings across the sensor? What prohibits having ISO level automatically set per pixel?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Why is the front element of a telephoto lens larger than a wide angle lens?
A wide angle lens has a wide angle of view, therefore it would make sense that the front of the lens would also be wide. A telephoto lens ha...
-
I have the Canon 600D and the "nifty fifty" 50mm f/1.8 that cost around 100$. One day when I was trying to switch lenses, I presse...
-
I found this scene to be quite beautiful for sure, but when I look at it from the photographer's view point, I find that that person ju...
-
How does Picasa decide how to process RAW photos? When I shoot in RAW+JPEG the two pictures can look dramatically different. Is it just conv...
-
If you look at a source like Library of Congress royalty free gallery, they go an extra step beyond just dumping a bunch of images, but pro...
No comments:
Post a Comment