ISO is been around since analogue photo times. Any, it should have been uniform for obvious reasons - you could never know what will be captured in each part of the film. So, you go uniform (ISO 100, ISO 200), select appropriate one for given conditions and do your best. Fast forward to today and we have same approach. Despite the fact that in digital photography "you know" or, rather, image sensor knows what will be captured by each pixel or group of pixels. Here's the question, why it couldn't measure sensitivity per area or, even, per pixel and have nonuniform ISO settings across the sensor? What prohibits having ISO level automatically set per pixel?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Why is the front element of a telephoto lens larger than a wide angle lens?
A wide angle lens has a wide angle of view, therefore it would make sense that the front of the lens would also be wide. A telephoto lens ha...
-
If you look at a source like Library of Congress royalty free gallery, they go an extra step beyond just dumping a bunch of images, but pro...
-
I am looking to build a camera trap for wildlife viewing, able to capture pictures (or even videos) in decent quality to be able to identify...
-
Does anyone know if there is a plugin available for the GIMP that will let you view and edit all the EXIF information associated with an ima...
-
So I'm looking at the wikipedia article on Aperture, and I'm a bit confused. I understand aperture to be the diameter of the hole th...
No comments:
Post a Comment