I have somewhat idea of the difference between these but would like to understand it with an example.
Few questions
Nikon D7000 Vs equivalent Full frame camera
1) Portraits : Would there be any difference if rest of the kit is same, like external flash, strobes etc? Would I be able to produce equally good results professionally.
2) Low Light Photography : Is low light photography where the real power of full-frame professional cameras come into play?
3) Landscapes etc : Is full-frame required more for landscape, long distance, Gigs etc
4) Can I use D7000 for professional wedding photography. If not then where does it lack.
Where is the real potential of full-frame come along. I think what I am trying to understand is what I can & can't do(By way of example) with crop frames professionally.
Many Thanks
Answer
The Nikon D7000 is used by many working professional wedding photographers. It isn't at the top of it's class, especially considering its age now - but that doesn't mean it isn't being used still.
Can I use camera XYZ for professional purposes? is only something that you can answer. If clients see your portfolio of work, and pay you to shoot their event - then whatever tools you use to achieve success is up to you. No "photography police" are going to tell you that a D7000 isn't enough or that it isn't professional. I've seen people who charge money for photography and are using a Nikon D3200 with a kit lens. Is that a good idea; no not really - but again no one is going to stop you.
As already noted, the previous answer comparing crop sensor(APS-C) camera such as the D7000 to full frame(FX) cameras such as the D610 explains many of your questions well:
I would also encourage you to explore the wedding tag:
No comments:
Post a Comment