Friday, 9 June 2017

Should I use in-camera noise reduction, or is it better to leave that for desktop-based post-production?




Possible Duplicate:
Is in-camera high-ISO noise reduction worthwhile?



Should this be done using image processing software like Photoshop or the built in function of the camera ?


It seems a program like Photoshop would use a much better algorithm than what would be available in the camera, or does the camera do something else before taking the image?


Isn't the logic here the same as the logic for digital zoom (usefull only when shooting in a compressed format, as the zoom is done before compressing)? Or is there something else?




Related questions:





Answer



It should be done in post-processing. You have absolute control of the noise-reduction parameters at that point and can rethink a setting if it smears your image too much. It's best to shoot in RAW and postpone what decisions you can until you get into Lightroom or Photoshop or [insert tool of choice here].


No comments:

Post a Comment

Why is the front element of a telephoto lens larger than a wide angle lens?

A wide angle lens has a wide angle of view, therefore it would make sense that the front of the lens would also be wide. A telephoto lens ha...